Unmarried Couples

Family law can affect people in virtually any kind of relationship. Some people are involved in long-term, committed relationships which qualify as "common-law," others are in shorter relationships, perhaps lasting for only one night. When a relationship ends, a couple may have certain rights and obligations to each other, regardless of how long or short the relationship was, especially if children are involved.

This section concerns common-law relationships and relationships of less than two years' duration. Even though people in an unmarried relationship have not been formally wed, they may still have many of the same legal rights and obligations as people in a married relationship. Typically, these issues will involve the care and control of children, the payment of support and the division of assets.

This chapter will provide a brief introduction to the issues that common-law and other unmarried couples often face when a relationship ends, and discuss a few urban myths about unmarried relationship.

Introduction

For the purposes of the provincial Family Relations Act, you are in a common-law relationship if you and your partner have lived together as a couple for more than two years in a "marriage-like relationship." Common-law partners can be of the same or opposite sexes. Relationships that are less than two years' long are not common-law relationship under provincial legislation, although they may qualify for the purposes of federal legislation.

Common-law relationships end when the "marriage-like" quality of the relationship ends, usually when a couple decides to break up. Contrary to popular belief, common-law couples are not married; without a civil or religious ceremony, you are not married and there are no legal steps which must be taken to end the relationship. A common-law relationship is over when it's over! A common-law couple does not need to get a divorce to formally terminate their relationship.

The same idea about separation applies to people in relationships of less than two years' duration. A relationship like this ends when the couple breaks up or stops dating.

Legislation

When married people break up, they are usually concerned about things like spousal support, the division of the family assets, and how the children will be looked after. Common-law couples and other unmarried couples share much of the same problems. From a legal perspective, the difference between married, common-law and other unmarried couples lies which laws apply and, sometimes, how they apply.

  • Married couples can apply for relief under both the federal Divorce Act and the provincial Family Relations Act. The Divorce Act doesn't apply to umarried people.
  • Common-law couples can only apply for relief under the provincial Family Relations Act, and the sort of relief they can apply for is, generally speaking, limited to relief involving the care and control of children, child support and spousal support.
  • Unmarried couples who have been together for less than two years can only seek relief under the provincial Family Relations Act, and the sort of relief they can apply for is limited to relief involving the care of children and child support.
  • Unmarried couples are excluded from the parts of the Family Relations Act that deal with property. Unmarried couples can only divide assets under the law of trusts or, in some cases, under legislation like the Partition of Property Act.

Under s. 1 of the Family Relations Act, "parent" and "spouse" are defined as follows:

"parent" includes
(a) a guardian or guardian of the person of a child, or
(b) a stepparent of a child if
(i) the stepparent contributed to the support and maintenance of the child for at least one year, and
(ii) the proceeding under this Act by or against the stepparent is commenced within one year after the date the stepparent last contributed to the support and maintenance of the child;
"spouse" means a person who
(a) is married to another person,
(b) except under Parts 5 and 6, lived with another person in a marriage-like relationship for a period of at least 2 years if the application under this Act is made within one year after they ceased to live together and, for the purposes of this Act, the marriage-like relationship may be between persons of the same gender,
(c) applies for an order under this Act within 2 years of the making of an order
(i) for dissolution of the person's marriage,
(ii) for judicial separation, or
(iii) declaring the person's marriage to be null and void, or
(d) is a former spouse for the purpose of proceedings to enforce or vary an order.
(2) For the purpose of paragraph (b) of the definition of "parent" in subsection (1), a person is the stepparent of a child if the person and a parent of the child
(a) are or were married, or
(b) lived together in a marriage-like relationship for a period of at least 2 years and, for the purposes of this Act, the marriage-like relationship may be between persons of the same gender.

A number of important points follow from these definitions:

  • The biological parents of a child are automatically "parents," regardless of the nature of the relationship between them.
  • A "parent" also includes anyone who has "lived in a marriage-like" relationship with a natural parent of a child for at least two years, including straight common-law couples and same-sex common-law couples.
  • The whole of the Family Relations Act, except for the parts dealing with the division of property and pensions (Parts 5 and 6), applies to any couple who has "lived in a marriage-like relationship" for at least two years.
  • A common-law partner must bring a claim for spousal support within one year after the relationship ends, after which the claim will be barred by statute.
  • A claim against a person qualifying as a step-parent must be brought within one year after that person last contributed to the support of the child, after which the claim will be barred by statute.

For couples who have not married, the linch pin is whether their relationship qualifies as a "marriage-like relationship." While the Family Relations Act clearly includes same-sex couples within this definition, it does not specify what "marriage-like" means, only the case law does. For a better discussion of "marriage-like," see the following chapter.

Common-law and unmarried couples, that is, couples who aren't married and don't qualify as common-law, can rely on the provisions of the Family Relations Act for the following purposes:

  1. Child Support: unmarried and common-law relationships;
  2. Spousal Support: common-law relationships; and,
  3. Child Custody, Guardianship and Access: unmarried and common-law relationships.

Making a Choice

Unmarried couples can do all of the things married couples can. They can live together, they can have a child together, they can buy a house together, and they can have relationships that last for decades and look, in all respects, exactly like married relationships. Why is there a difference in the way the law treats unmarried couples?

In the 2003 Supreme Court of Canada case of Walsh v. Bona, the court was asked to decide whether it was unfair to deny unmarried couples the benefits of certain legislation that only married couples had. In its decision, the court held that regardless of how the similar the parties' relationship appeared to a married relationship, the parties had nevertheless made the choice not to become married, and the fact that they chose not to marry meant that they had also chosen not to become a part of the class of persons to whom that legislation applied.

Becoming married implies a certain level of committment to one another that simply living together usually does not. The parties to a marriage expect that their relationship will be permanent, a view which is widely accepted in society. This view of marriage is not always shared by unmarried couples, some of whom take the political or philosophical view that formal marriage is personally inappropriate, morally objectionable, fundamentally misogynistic or simply archaic and out of step with contemporary society.

Nevertheless, until the governments of Canada and British Columbia open the laws to all types of relationship, a distinction will continue to be drawn between married and unmarried couples. The following is a brief summary of the major distinctions:

Married Couples
Common-Law Couples
Other Couples
Divorce Yes
Care of Children Yes Yes Yes
Child Support Yes Yes Yes
Spousal Support Yes Yes
Family Assets Yes
Trust Claims to Assets Yes Yes Yes
Government Benefits Yes Yes
Wills & Estates Yes Yes
The Alternatives to Marriage Project

The Alternatives to Marriage Project is an interesting American organization seeking equality for unmarried couples, including straight and same-sex couples, with married couples. It takes the view that people who chose not to marry or cannot marry deserve equal rights and equal protection under the law as married couples. Their website offers a broad array of information for unmarried couples, visit it at www.unmarried.org.

Back to the top of this chapter.

A few Urban Myths

"Marriage"

It is not true that a common-law couple is automatically "married" once they've lived together for a certain amount of time, nor is there any such thing as a "common-law marriage." You can have lived together for twenty years and still not be legally married; a common-law couple is never "married" unless there is an actual marriage ceremony.

It is not true that you become a common-law couple simply by living with someone. You must be living together in a romantic, "marriage-like" relationship to become a common-law couple; mere roommates will not become a common-law couple by accident.

Separation and the "Legal Separation"

There is no such thing as a "legal separation" in British Columbia, nor is it possible to be "legally separated." Whether you're in a common-law relationship or a formal marriage, you are separated the moment you decide that the relationship is over. That's it, there's no magic to it. When you or your partner leaves, boom, you're separated.

"Divorce"

It is not true that common-law couples need to be divorced. Once you've decided to separate, the relationship is over, regardless of how long the relationship may have been.

Back to the top of this chapter.


Site Navigation

Continue to the next chapter:
Unmarried Couples > Unmarried Relationships.

Go back to the start of this chapter.
Go to the start page of this website.

Section Menu

The Legal System · Alternatives to Court · Children · Child Support · Spousal Support
Family Assets · Family Agreements · Marriage & Divorce · Same-Sex Couples
Other Family Law Issues · Breaking News

Resources Menu

Site Map & Index · Legislation · Resources & Links · Definitions · Feedback
How do I ? · About the Author · Reviews & Write Ups · Help!


Please ensure you take the time to read these important legal notices.

Terms of Use · Copyright Notice · Disclaimer · Privacy & Confidentiality · Press Kit

Copyright © 2001-2006 John-Paul Boyd. All rights reserved.

Click here to go back to the start page. The Legal System Alternatives to Court Children Child Support Spousal Support Family Assets Family Agreements Marriage, Separation & Divorce Same-Sex Couples Unmarried Couples Unmarried Couples > Unmarried Relationships Unmarried Couples > Common-Law Relationships Unmarried Couples > Q&A Other Family Law Issues Breaking News Site Map & Index Legislation Resources & Links How do I ? Feedback Definitions About the Author Reviews & Write Ups Help! Press Kit