 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
This chapter is for people have children together but who either didn't live together or lived together for less than two years. The following chapter, Unmarried Couples > Common-Law Relationships, is for unmarried couples who lived together for two or more years. This chapter provides a brief overview of the legal issues unmarried couples may have to deal with and those they don't, and discusses the two most common issues, child support and the care of children. Introduction The Family Relations Act is intended to apply to couples that are or were in serious relationships, and to couples who weren't in serious relationships but have children. Almost all relief the act affords, except for relief relating to children, is not available to couples who lived together for less than two years or who never lived together at all. As a result, people in these sorts of relationship will not be entitled to claim spousal support from the other party or a share in assets owned only by that party. The Divorce Act only applies to people who are or were married to each other; it does not apply to unmarried couples, including couples who qualify as common-law. Relief Available to Unmarried Couples Children There is no minimum length-of-relationship requirement for any claim involving children. A parent is a parent no matter the nature of the relationship which produced the child. A parent may apply for all of the relief available under the Family Relations Act that concerns children, from child support to custody to the various restraining orders that are available to protect a child. Issues about children are discussed at greater length further on in this chapter. Property In a short relationship, each party will generally be entitled keep whatever he or she brought into the relationship. In the case of jointly owned assets, assets which both parties own and are registered in the names of both parties, like a house or a car, there is a legal presumption that each party has an equal interest in such assets, whether both parties contributed equally to their purchase or not. It is possible, in certain circumstances, for someone who doesn't own an asset to nevertheless claim an interest in that asset under trust law. There is no minimum length-of-relationship requirement for claims under the law of trusts. Depending on the nature of the property claim, relief may be available in Provincial (Small Claims) Court, and you may be able to avoid having to go to the Supreme Court. Small Claims Court can hear straightforward claims, such as for the return of property or the repayment of debt, but it cannot hear trust claims. Only the Supreme Court can do that. You will also want to go to the Supreme Court if the value of the asset in dispute is more than $25,000. Information about trust claims to assets can be found in the chapter Family Assets > Dividing Assets. Government Benefits The most important thing to know on this topic is that most federal legislation defines a "spouse" as someone who has been in a cohabiting relationship for at least one year, as opposed to British Columbia's legislation which generally requires a two year relationship to qualify. As a result, someone in a relationship of at least one year may qualify for any federal benefits that depend on a spousal relationship although they probably won't qualify for provincial benefits. People in a relationship of less than one year will not usually qualify for any benefits at all. Relief Not Available to Unmarried Couples Spousal Support Section 1 of the Family Relations Act defines a "spouse" as someone who has lived in a marriage-like relationship with someone else for at least two years. As only spouses are eligible for spousal support, people in relationships for less than two years do not qualify to claim spousal support from the other party. Property The Family Relations Act expressly excludes anyone who isn't legally married from the part of the act that deals with the division of assets. As a result, all unmarried couples, including common-law couples, cannot rely on the act to divide family assets. The only kind of property claim an unmarried party can advance is through trust law when the asset at issue is not jointly owned. Back to the top of this chapter. Child Support Child support is payable by anyone who is the biological parent of a child, no matter how brief or how long the relationship was which produced the child. Section 88 of the Family Relations Act states that: Each parent of a child is responsible and liable for the reasonable and necessary support and maintenance of the child. According to s. 93(1)(a) of the act, child support is to be paid in the amount specified by the Child Support Guidelines. As a result, all of the provisions of the Guidelines apply to unmarried parents, including:
Note that nothing in either the Family Relations Act or the Child Support Guidelines allows a parent to escape paying support through some quirk in the circumstances under which the child was conceived. In certain circumstances, the only question remaining is whether or not the paying parent is actually the biological parent of the child. If that's an issue, a paternity test can always be taken. Additional information about child support and the Guidelines can be found in the section Child Support. Additional information about paternity, the presumption of paternity and paternity testing can be found in the chapter Other Family Issues > Paternity Issues. Back to the top of this chapter. Children Just as the simple fact of being a biological parent triggers a responsible for child support, it also triggers rights with respect to the parenting of the child. As with married parents and common-law parents, parents in short relationships also have rights with respect to:
All of these issues are canvassed at length in the section Children. There are, however, two important points you should be aware of. Sections of 27(5) and 34(1) of the Family Relations Act provide, in part, as follows: 27(5) Subject to section 28, if the father and mother of a child (a) have not been married to each other during the life of the child or 10 months before the child's birth,(b) are living separate and apart, and(c) do not share joint guardianship under this section or under an order of a tribunal of competent jurisdiction, the mother is the sole guardian unless a tribunal of competent jurisdiction otherwise orders. 34(1) Subject to subsection (2), the persons who may exercise custody over a child are as follows: (a) if the father and mother live together, the father and mother jointly;(b) if the father and mother live separate and apart, the parent with whom the child usually resides; What that all boils down to is this: if the unmarried parents of a child have separated, unless there is a court order to the contrary, the mother is presumed to have sole guardianship of the child, and the parent presumed to have custody of the child is the parent with whom the child usually lives. Back to the top of this chapter. Site Navigation
Continue to the next chapter: Section Menu
The Legal System · Alternatives to Court · Children · Child Support · Spousal Support Resources Menu
Site Map & Index · Legislation · Resources & Links · Definitions · Feedback
Please ensure you take the time to read these important legal notices. | |
